A Freshman’s Dream
While I was reading some tropical geometry (not to be confused with topological geometry), I stumbled across the Freshman’s Dream, which states that In standard mathematics, this is, of course, false. We know that in general The Binomial Theorem. However, I wanted to take a closer look at this false identity.
Warning (Freshman's Dream (generally false))
For all
where This (false) identity only holds for
This leads to the question of which algebraic structures admit an analogue of the Freshman’s Dream? There’s many actually, but we’ll take a look at tropical geometry, of course.
Tropical Geometry
We will start by defining the elementary operations of tropical geometry.
Definition (Tropical arithmetic (addition and multiplication))
The main object of study is the tropical semiring Here addition and multiplication of real numbers are defined as
and
The of two numbers is the minimum of and and the of two numbers is the sum of both numbers.
Example (Arithmetic)
The tropical sum of and is . This is written as
The tropical product of and is . We write this as
Lemma (Basic tropical rules)
Now you may have noticed that a lot of the standard rules of arithmetic also hold in tropical arithmetic. For example
and
That is, commutativity in tropical addition and tropical multiplication. There’s also distributivity:
We have an identity element for namely, And an identity element for namely,
The identities involving the two identities are:
Proof
Soon.
Now this is about enough information. Yes, we can still extend this for polynomials and vectors, etc., but for our purposes, that isn’t necessary. We will now define tropical powers and the binomial expansion in then prove the Freshman’s Dream in a tropical universe.
Definition (Tropical powers)
Let }. For define
and for define
In particular, if then (usual sum), and if then for all .
Definition (Binomial expansion in )
Define, for ,
Proposition ( in tropical arithmetic)
Proof (Induction)
For , the claim is trivial: by Definition 1.6, and
so . Now we will induct on . For the base case , we have:
By Definition 1.6 again, we take , so
Hence
so eqref12 holds for .
Suppose . Then
Now expanding using commutativity eqref5 and distributivity eqref6, we have:
Using eqref6 again inside each term we get:
Therefore
By the definition of tropical powers, for any we have
Hence
so
Reindexing the second sum with , so :
We’re left with
This is the -sum of all terms for ; this might look a little strange because the middle terms appear twice, but duplicates do not change the tropical sum since . Therefore
Theorem (Freshman's Dream (tropical version))
For all and we have
Proof
follows trivially, and Now let .
Case 1: .
From Proposition 1.8 and Definition 1.7 eqref11,
Computing one general term using Definition 1.6 and eqref3 we get:
So
Rewriting this in terms of eqref2 from Definition 1.2,
Setting . We’ll evaluate the discrete difference (ordinary subtraction in ).
So is monotone in :
If , then , hence for all , so the minimum occurs at :
If , then , hence for all , so the minimum occurs at :
In either case,
(using eqref2 in the last equality). Finally, by Definition 1.6, and . Therefore
Case 2: or .
WLOG . By tropical addition eqref2,
hence
Also, by Definition 1.6, (since and ). So using tropical addition again eqref2,
Thus in this case as well.
Now there is a way shorter proof of this (because you can prove directly from the definition), but I wanted to see how the tropical binomial expansion pedagogically collapsed.
References
- Maclagan, D., & Sturmfels, B. (2015). Introduction to tropical geometry (Graduate Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 161). American Mathematical Society.